Articles  

Harry Brown

Column: The Word on Films  |  Date Published: Wednesday, 28 April 10   |  Author: Allan Sko   |     |  1 year, 9 months ago
COMMENT HERE: comment


On first inspection, Harry Brown presents itself as the British equivalent of Clint Eastwood’s Gran Torino. Ex-military pensioner protagonist? Check. Disillusioned at the surrounding neighbourhood? Check. Spurned into vigilante action by a shocking event close to home? Check.

Being British, you can expect Harry Brown to be grimmer than its American counterpart, and to be well acted and well shot. Check on all three counts again. What you don’t expect from the normally-nuanced British is for their characters to be underdeveloped and largely two-dimensional, thus robbing the film of its potential full impact. Gran Torino succeeds because Eastwood’s Walt Kowlaski and the situation around him is what writing lecturers would refer to as ‘complicated’; war has made him racist, and he struggles to come to terms with living with good people of an ethnicity he’s been trained to hate. Caine’s Harry Brown is a good character played in typically beautiful fashion by Caine, but he’s too good, and his enemies are too horrid. The always excellent Sean Harris (you may remember him from his wonderful turn as troubled Joy Division frontman Ian Curtis in 24 Hour Party People) is almost comical as the utterly depraved dealer Stretch, and director Daniel Barber and actor Ben Drew have done well in creating one of the vilest antagonists put to recent cinema in Noel Winters. While this would make for an excellent action film villain, here it robs a socio-character piece such as Harry Brown from the tragedy writer Gary Young and Barber could have achieved with more rounded characters. In the end, we have a valiant effort that falls short of truly powerful revenge cinema.



Mother:

Just to give you some context – I LOVE director Joon-Ho Bong’s 2006 creature feature The Host. I’m also a big fan of his earlier film Memories of Murder. As such I’ve been waiting for Mother since I first heard whisperings of its imminent arrival. Did it live up to the hype? Hmmm, not quite.

As far as filmmaking goes, it gets almost every element down pat. It looks superb – utilising the ultra-slick, rich visuals common to Joon-Ho’s earlier efforts. The winding pathways of the ramshackle village mesh well with the open-field landscapes and haunting woods. The central performance is beyond words. Hye-Ja Kim’s turn as the Mother of Yoon Do-Joon (Bin Won) a mentally-disabled man accused of murder; runs the full gamut of character and emotion. The merest flicker of her eyes speaks volumes, while her screams and wails contain a subtlety and nuance that’s completely captivating.

The problems, unfortunately, are in the story and pacing. Mother spends too much of the time pleading with other characters – cops, Do-Joon’s friend Jin-Tae (Goo Jin) – to fix the situation for her. It’s only once Jin-Tae tells her to take matters into her own hands that the film really gets going; and by this time we’ve lost half the running time.

Mother is still a great watch. The opening scenes are extraordinary, and the shot construction is as interesting and innovative as you’ll see in modern cinema. It’s just not as entertaining as I would have liked. But maybe it just needed a mutated river monster?

COMMENT HERE: comment »
Hot Tub Time Machine:

“What, the fuck, did you expect?” I hear you yell. “Better.” I feebly respond.

Four guys get in a hot tub and are transported back to the eighties with a chance to fix their disappointing lives. It sounded so terrible I could only assume it would be brilliant. It’s not. It’s a film about four guys who get in a hot tub and are transported back to the eighties with a chance to fix their disappointing lives.

Honestly, I blame Judd Apatow for my naïveté. The 40 Year Old Virgin and Knocked Up convinced me that terrible concepts could be done brilliantly. But not here.

I’m sure I won’t be the only one to point out the irony that this sort of concept could only be truly popular in the eighties. But then it would have been done by John Hughes and would have had heart, instead of this long string of laughless set-pieces using liberal helpings of profanity and gross-out humour to hide their lack of substance. Sure, it tries a tongue-in-cheek approach, hoping we’ll run with the gag without explanation. But in these hands the wink and the nod comes off more as a mock-Tourette’s-twitch.

At one point, John Cusack actually utters the words: “Three days ago, or twenty years depending on how you judge the space/time continuum, you would have been the last people I’d want to sit down with.” We’re right there with you, John. Maybe we all needed a time-travel experience to give us a perspective where we could enjoy this shit.

COMMENT HERE: comment »
 

Previous Mother »

 
blog comments powered by Disqus




more ...
more stuff ...