Articles  

(500) Days of Summer

Column: The Word on Films  |  Date Published: Wednesday, 30 September 09   |  Author: Mark Russell   |     |  2 years, 4 months ago
COMMENT HERE: comment


Buyer beware, going into this film thinking it's a romantic comedy is like going into Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure expecting a sci-fi; its core plot fits the genre, but the intention is completely different. (500) Days of Summer is the story of Tom (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), whose banal existence working for a greeting card company is thrown into disrepair upon meeting Summer (Zooey Deschanel). From here we alternate between heartbreak and happiness, jumping everywhere over the five hundred day timeline of their relationship.

'Indie twee' is harsh but oh-so-fair to describe this interesting film from music video director Marc Webb. It's all cool songs, obscure references and endless cardigans, in the successful tradition of Garden State et al. There's more here than paint by numbers quirkiness but whenever things get a little too straight-laced, the filmmakers promptly throw in a cutaway sequence or spontaneous dance number. These are quite well handled, even if they do occasionally detract from the main drawcards of the film - being the performances of Gordon-Levitt and Deschanel. We see their characters in the murky part of a relationship too often to describe what they have as chemistry but that's kind of the point, and they're great by themselves.

Good word of mouth about this film is travelling as quickly as someone can safely run in skinny-leg jeans, and it's certainly worth it for a good dose of the jaded romantic. Naturally, it also comes ready-built with a great soundtrack.



Fame:

Ten reasons not to see Fame:

  1. The lack of plot. A bunch of teenagers attend a respected performing arts high school. Some dance. Some sing, or do other stuff. That's actually the whole plot.
  2. The sheer number of characters - quantity ain't always quality. I realised about two thirds of the way through that I had no idea what any of their names were. I still don't know what some of their names are.
  3. Character development - or rather, the large gaping holes where character development should be. Shouldn't there be some development, especially in a film that is supposed to be a 'coming of age' story? Each character is shallower than the last, and none have any real back story...or current story.
  4. The style. Fame feels like one long montage, but one with zero emotional depth.
  5. The timeline. The film is divided into each year of high school, and crams four years into two hours - so you never know how much time has passed between each scene. Has it been two months? Two days? Luckily, you soon stop caring.
  6. The dance sequences. They're good. Really good. Unfortunately, this makes everything else look even more pointless in comparison.
  7. Corny monologues and exchanges that actually make you cringe.
  8. The lack of an amazing end performance.
  9. The fact that the end credit sequence is more fun and entertaining than most of the film.
  10. Do you really need another?
COMMENT HERE: comment »
Paper Heart:

Mockumentary is a genre that commands an incredible subtlety of performance. Since this seemed a little too easy, Paper Heart has added the element of having almost every actor playing themselves.

The film is presented as comedienne/actress Charlyne Yi's study of her own refusal to believe in love. She travels the country with director/producer Nicholas Jasenovec (played very charismatically on screen by Jake M Johnson) interviewing people about their thoughts and experiences on the subject in an effort to understand the concept better. Somewhere along the way, she starts up a relationship of her own with Juno/Superbad actor Michael Cera. This becomes the framework for the rest of the 'documentary.'

There are definitely a lot of great moments to Paper Heart and some really superb acting from the central performers. The main problem is that it's too hard to get sucked into Yi and Cera's blossoming love. They are believable but the serendipitous nature of the scenario isn't. This is because if they don't get together - there is no documentary. If you take away this story then all you have is Yi and Johnson driving around with very little focus or cohesion and only the slim 'what does love mean to you?' question to tie things together. It's also fairly ironic that Yi is too closed off and distant for us to ever truly fall in love with her.

An interesting concept that could have been something special with a little more work.

COMMENT HERE: comment »
 

« Fame Next
Previous Mao's Last Dancer »

 
blog comments powered by Disqus




more ...
more stuff ...